There is a pretty cool description of the History of MMS and the challenges it faced on the Wikipedia.
Essentially, the “Bells” built standards for Mobile Messaging, and our Wikipedia explores some of the technical failures of it. In simple terms chief of the technical problems include:
-
In-compatible Handsets or Poor Configurations
-
In-efficient transfers, especially when sending to lists
The scale of the poor performance was explained by Sourabh & Anoj from MicroAppli explained to at our previous E-27. On the 10 MMS that they were sending to test it’s dependability, they found that 8 would not reach the destination because of either handset issues, configuration issues or carrier issues or any other random issue. Now, I dunno abt u guys but an 80% failure rate is a heck of a high one for me to use it.
But, let’s assume that we got all of these technical problems out of the way, and simply when I send a MMS, it will reach my intended recipient. Would I still use it?
Well, I think not yet. There are a few things to still consider:
-
KISS (Keep it simple, sweety) for us => Although this is really not that big, but I have been fiddling around with my phone for the last 10 minutes and I have pressed all kinds of buttons only just to figure out how to send it. Got too many configurations, requires too many settings. Very un-user friendly still….
-
Would the dog eat the dog food? => Why do I need to send an image to anyone? Sometimes, I need to talk to a person to discuss stuff (so phone call), other times I need to drop a note to a person (so SMS), do I generally go to a person and show him photos (unless they are close friends). Even if I do, it is never that urgent that I need to send it by my phone. Not a regular thing, is it?
-
Show me the money? => The telcos still have a very tight grip on the way money flows, they are the only ones benefiting. There are no partners doing anything for the Telcos making it a one sided game. No one’s really that excited
-
Evangalizers or Salesmen? => We have more and more funky sales techniques from 1 MMS = 3 SMS to now 1 MMS = 1 SMS seamless converstion, but every proponent of it is a salesman and not an evangalizer. Just not interested! Thank you.
Very simply, in my view, the main mistake is “listen”. Listen to what people want – something cool/hip straight forward, super simple and pretty cheap. They are getting the free 30-900 MMS Free a month thing, so they are getting that right, but everything else… not really.
Make everyone around super excited about it. Once a “cool” group starts messaging around; they’ll have influence over another group, and the viral effect will start. They can achieve the same with advertising. The MMS urge and excitement is so lacking.
Now this is the youth market. Why youths? Because they have been always on top of the tech trends, always the Early Adopters of every thing new and cool. How about the older segment? They are pragmatists. They need high value, low cost with proven results only then will they move.
Hmm…. what else….? Can’t think of anything else of the top of my head. Anyone got any fierce objections? benevolent additions? or just simply any comments about this? What do you guys think?
8 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
First of all, MMS doesn’t serve a huge need. What is the only thing that you can do with MMS but not with SMS? Sending a photo! How many people have an urgent need to spend $0.60 to forward a photo to someone? I would say very few on this planet!
MMS sort of sits between SMS and GPRS in terms of the features it offers.
Comment by Harish Mallipeddi June 30, 2006 @ 11:46 amWell, a lot of plans do have a ton of free MMS now. It’s isn’t the money. The key problem that you are pointing out is the “Will the dog eat the dog food” problem –> why do I need to send it, as you rightly pointed out. I or my friends really don’t need such an instant gratification! No compelling application or killer reason!
Comment by anubhav June 30, 2006 @ 12:03 pmThe problem is with the adaptation rate of the customers. Very simple, it took some time for people to get use to text sms, and the threshold to make them to use mms require more effort. Somehow, the telcos overhyped the markets with the 3G concept.
Comment by bleongcw June 30, 2006 @ 1:59 pmfor all things edgy with cell phone technologies, always look to the japanese and understand how they did it. Just what is so different between their society and culture that is so different from ours? If you ask me, the engineers already did their job but the useability folks are failing to connect with the marketers to find a good value prop. I personally dunno the details of what Starhub is doing in Singapore but I don’t think culture is all that different between here and Japan, there must be a niche in any local market outside of Japan where that micro-japan culture exisits. From there, send in the market researchers to do ethnographic studies.
For those who read Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell, where are the cool Hush Puppy early adopters?
Well, of course there might be another thing affecting the slow takeups and that might be the crippling operating costs, maybe bandwidth for data transfer etc… This problem hence extends to 3G as well, i-mode just won;t fly then.
But I am still waiting for a WiMax wireless entwork to cover the whole world and have my Skype phone make free calls. But damn those telcos for thinking of network un-neutrality to safeguard their positions against the broadband world.
Comment by bjornlee June 30, 2006 @ 3:14 pmAnubhav, not many plans have MMS still… hence the price would be a barrier to many. Also, not everyone has the fancy colored screens yet, believe it or not, so, baby pictures to grandpa will go through the internet or the snail mail.
As for me as a user, I agree with Bjorn. I’ll wait for the WiMax. Believe it or not, I really don’t want to pay a penny more than what it is worth.
voIP… remember the Danger device? Think the concept will take off soon, but first the foundation before the building.
In the meantime, send your pics to my Gmail.
Comment by Sue June 30, 2006 @ 5:02 pmCombining Bernard, Bjorn’s comments. The Japanese got it right cause their market adopts the mobile technology stuff dang fast…! It’s amazing, they’ll dig out all the hidden features and begin using it on a regular basis. It’s a culture within Japan from what I hear.
They may be still at the visionary stage and couldn’t really get on to the early adopters stage either. The appeal just isn’t there.
Again these issues point to the “KISS” and the Evangelists dilemma!
Then, there is the phone compatibility and the price issue that Sue again brought out. Let’s just say that price is also an issue, just that I don’t see it as significant as everything else mentioned.
I’ll gmail you the pics alrite
Comment by anubhav July 1, 2006 @ 2:56 amhey dude, long time! didn’t know you had a blog… thou it’s all foreign to me
Comment by daniela July 3, 2006 @ 11:57 pmas far as MMS, i sometimes send myself the pix i take with my cellphone camera because i don’t have a data cable for my phone. ha! probably an uncommon use case… (-;
Just starting up now…let’s link up…lolz… your case is defininately an unconventional case for sure. Don’t the telcos charge you each time you need to send an e-mail?
Comment by Anubhav July 4, 2006 @ 12:09 am